Key Requirements in Mobile Banking Design for Sustainable Decision-Making

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64293/mentor.v2i4.39

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Sustainability, Mobile Banking, User-Centered Design, Behavioral Change, Digital Intervention

Özet

Sustainability has become a practical necessity rather than a theoretical ideal because of increasing environmental challenges and consumption-driven lifestyles. In this context, user experience (UX) design offers significant potential to support sustainable habit formation through digital behavior-change interventions. Mobile banking applications, which are widely adopted tools embedded in everyday financial routines, provide a suitable environment for integrating sustainability-oriented interaction mechanisms. This study aims to identify key design requirements that support sustainable decision-making in mobile banking applications and propose a user-centered conceptual model grounded in behavioral change theories. Adopting a Research through Design (RtD) and Design Thinking approach, the study combines a literature review of behavioural change models with a needs analysis based on a user survey and case study evaluations. As a synthesis of these stages, the Deneko prototype was developed to enhance users’ financial and environmental awareness, encourage positive habit formation through small and incremental actions, and strengthen motivation through community-based interaction. The conceptual framework of Deneko is structured around three dimensions: Balance, Experimentation, and Community. Interaction mechanisms, such as personalized goals, progress tracking, gamification, micro-rewards, and social interaction, were implemented in alignment with established behavioral change models. The findings indicate that behavior change–oriented interaction mechanisms can enhance user motivation and support sustainable decision-making processes in mobile banking experiences.

Referanslar

Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705

Corral Verdugo, V. (2012). The positive psychology of Sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.6.1024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. Educational Technology & Society. 18. 75-88.

Evans, J., & Frankish, K. (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press. http://oro.open.ac.uk/22096/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.001.0001

Fogg, B. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999

Gardner, B., Lally, P., & Wardle, J. (2012). Making health habitual: The psychology of ‘habit-formation’ and general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 62(605), 664–666. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12x659466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X659466

Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Lally, P., Wardle, J., & Gardner, B. (2011). Experiences of habit formation: A qualitative study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 16(4), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2011.555774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2011.555774

Ly, A. M., & Cope, M. R. (2023). New Conceptual Model of Social Sustainability: Review from past concepts and ideas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075350

Mankoff, J. C., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S. R., Hasbrouck, J., Woodruff, A. & Sengers, P. (2007). Environmental sustainability and interaction. CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1240963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1240963

McKay, F. H., Slykerman, S. & Dunn, M. (2019). The app behavior change scale: Creation of a scale to assess the potential of apps to promote behavior change. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/11130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/11130

Michie, S., van Stralen, M.M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci 6, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. MIT Press.

Piccolo, L., Scharl, A., & Baranauskas, C. (2012). Design of Eco-Feedback Technology to Motivate Sustainable Behavior: Cultural Aspects in a Brazilian Context. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia.

Pinder, C., Vermeulen, J., Cowan, B. R., & Beale, R. (2018). Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(3), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3196830

Quintal, F., Pereira, L., Nunes, N. J., & Nisi, V. (2015). What-a-watt: Exploring electricity production literacy through a long term eco-feedback study. 2015 Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/sustainit.2015.7101365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SustainIT.2015.7101365

Suluk, S. (2023). The stages of digital banking and digital banking in the light of current developments.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.

Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678

Wu, C., Liu, Z., & Xu, H. (2021). The approaches of positive experience design on IOT Intelligent Products. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2021.05.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2021.05.012

Van Dessel, P., Boddez, Y., & Hughes, S. (2022). Nudging societally relevant behavior by promoting cognitive inferences. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12964-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12964-1

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications design and methods. SAGE Publications.

Zamakhsyari, F., & Fatwanto, A. (2023). A systematic literature review of Design Thinking Approach for user interface design. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 7(4), 2313. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.4.01615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.4.01615

Zapico, J. L., Katzeff, C., Bohné, U., & Milestad, R. (2016). Eco-feedback visualization for closing the gap of organic food consumption. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971507

Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 493-502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

Zhu, Y., Long, Y., Wang, H., Lee, K. P., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. J. (2024). Digital Behavior Change Intervention Designs for Habit Formation: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.2196/54375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/54375

İndir

Yayınlanmış

03.03.2026 — 03.03.2026 tarihinde güncellendi

Sürüm

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Aydın, M., & Cemelelioğlu, N. (2026). Key Requirements in Mobile Banking Design for Sustainable Decision-Making. Mentor, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.64293/mentor.v2i4.39

Sayı

Bölüm

Makaleler

Benzer Makaleler

1 2 > >> 

Bu makale için ayrıca gelişmiş bir benzerlik araması başlat yapabilirsiniz.